New petrol station could still be given green light despite council's 'poor design' concerns
A petrol station could still be built next to a busy route into Wolverhampton despite the city council saying it was "poorly designed".
Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
The move to build the petrol station, car wash and shop on the site of the old Newbridge Service Station off Tettenhall Road, Wolverhampton, was rejected by Wolverhampton Council last year over fears it would be too noisy for neighbours.
However, the applicant Nottingham-based Bushbury Ltd has now appealed to the government’s planning inspector, which has the power to overrule the council, in a bid to get the decision overturned.
The plan was also criticised for being “poorly designed” with the council saying it needed more landscaping instead of hardstanding. The council’s planners also said the “utilitarian” forecourt would be to the "detriment of the surrounding area".
The shop would have had 6am to 11pm opening hours with the car wash operating until 9pm every day.
The land, next to the Newbridge pub, was used for a petrol station until 2005 when it was demolished but has remained empty since.
An application to build another petrol station was refused in 2006 and was left empty and overgrown until 2015 when the Co-op revealed plans to open a new supermarket. The plans were backed by the council but the work was never carried out and the land was sold again.
A statement included with the application said the new petrol station would have created more than 20 jobs.
“The site lies within a local centre and on a heavily trafficked route,” the statement said. “The proposed commercial and retail roadside use is entirely appropriate within this context.
“The proposed development will give rise to in excess of 20 new employment opportunities. It is likely that the majority of these roles will be filled by members of the local community, reducing out-migration for employment and enhancing the sustainability of the area and the proposal.”