Shropshire Star

Council budget cuts cost more than £130 a head on average

Labour said the figures show the ‘price of SNP austerity’.

Published
Last updated
Budget cuts to local authorities like Glasgow City Council have been criticised (Glasgow City Council)

Cuts to local authority budgets mean councils are spending £137 a year less per head on average, new analysis shows.

Figures from the Scottish Parliamentary Information Centre, commissioned by Labour, outline changes in the real-terms total revenue per head figures for councils across Scotland between 2013/14 and 2018/19.

The average drop across all of Scotland’s local authorities was £137 a head, which the party said was the “price of SNP austerity”.

The analysis shows residents in Glasgow are £210 worse off a year while for those in Edinburgh the figure is £216.

Among the smallest drops, excluding the island authorities which were said not to be directly comparable with the mainland due to their “exceptional circumstances” were North Ayrshire at £23 less a head and West Lothian at £67.

Scottish Labour finance spokesman James Kelly said: “These figures show the price of SNP austerity for individuals across Scotland.

“The SNP has slashed funding for lifeline services in recent years – and that translates as more than £200 a head since 2013-14 for people in Edinburgh and Glasgow.

“It means residents in places such as Aberdeen, East Lothian and Stirling have lost more than £100 of spending per head over the last five years.

“That is simply shocking.”

A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “In spite of continued UK Government real terms cuts to Scotland’s resource budget, we have treated local government very fairly.

“In 2018-19 councils will receive funding through the local government finance settlement of £10.7 billion, delivering a real terms increase in both revenue and capital funding.

“The total 2018-19 local government finance settlement delivers an increase of £342 million or 3.3% in support for vital local services compared to 2017-18.”

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.