Shropshire Star

Secret Service failures before Trump rally shooting ‘preventable’ – Senate panel

The interim report from the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee found multiple failures on almost every level.

Published
Donald Trump is bundled away after a shooting

Multiple Secret Service failures ahead of the July rally for former US president Donald Trump where a gunman opened fire were “foreseeable, preventable, and directly related to the events resulting in the assassination attempt that day”, according to a bipartisan Senate investigation released on Wednesday.

Similar to the agency’s own internal investigation and an ongoing bipartisan House probe, the interim report from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee found multiple failures on almost every level ahead of the Butler, Pennsylvania shooting, including in planning, communications, security and allocation of resources.

“The consequences of those failures were dire,” said Michigan Senator Gary Peters, the Democratic chairman of the Homeland panel.

Investigators found that there was no clear chain of command among the Secret Service and other security agencies and no plan for coverage of the building where the gunman climbed up to fire the shots.

Officials were operating on multiple, separate radio channels, leading to missed communications, and an inexperienced drone operator was stuck on a help line after his equipment was not working correctly.

Communications among security officials were a “multi-step game of telephone”, Mr Peters said.

The report found the Secret Service was notified about an individual on the roof of the building approximately two minutes before gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire, firing eight rounds in Mr Trump’s direction just 150 yards from where the former president was speaking.

Mr Trump, the 2024 Republican presidential nominee, was struck in the ear by a bullet or a bullet fragment in the assassination attempt, one rallygoer was killed and two others were injured before the gunman was killed by a Secret Service counter-sniper.

Approximately 22 seconds before Crooks fired, the report found, a local officer sent a radio alert that there was an armed individual on the building. But that information was not relayed to key Secret Service personnel who were interviewed by Senate investigators.

Donald Trump is covered by US Secret Service agents
Donald Trump is covered by US Secret Service agents at the campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania (Evan Vucci/AP)

The panel also interviewed a Secret Service counter-sniper who said that they saw officers with their guns drawn running toward the building where the gunman was perched, but the person said they did not think to notify anyone to get Mr Trump off the stage.

The Senate report comes just days after the Secret Service released a five-page document summarising the key conclusions of a yet-to-be finalised Secret Service report on what went wrong, and ahead of a Thursday hearing that will be held by a bipartisan House task force investigating the shooting.

The House panel is also investigating a second assassination attempt on Mr Trump earlier this month when Secret Service agents arrested a man with a rifle hiding on the golf course at Mr Trump’s Florida club.

Each investigation has found new details that reflect a massive breakdown in the former president’s security, and politicians say there is much more they want to find out as they try to prevent it from happening again.

“This was the result of multiple human failures of the Secret Service,” said Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, the top Republican on the panel.

The senators recommended that the Secret Service better define roles and responsibilities before any protective event, including by designating a single individual in charge of approving all the security plans.

Investigators found that many of the people in charge denied that they had responsibility for planning or security failures, and deflected blame.

Advance agents interviewed by the committee said that “planning and security decisions were made jointly, with no specific individual responsible for approval,” the report said.

Communication with local authorities was also poor. Local police had raised concern two days earlier about security coverage of the building where the gunman perched, telling Secret Service agents during a walk through that they did not have the manpower to lock it down.

Donald Trump raising his fist surrounded by Secret Service agents
A defiant Donald Trump following the shooting in July (Evan Vucci/AP)

Secret Service agents then gave investigators conflicting accounts about who was responsible for that security coverage, the report said.

The internal review released last week by the Secret Service also detailed multiple communications breakdowns, including an absence of clear guidance to local law enforcement and the failure to fix line-of-sight vulnerabilities at the rally grounds that left Mr Trump open to sniper fire and “complacency” among some agents.

“This was a failure on the part of the United States Secret Service. It’s important that we hold ourselves to account for the failures of July 13 and that we use the lessons learned to make sure that we do not have another failure like this again,” said Ronald Rowe Jr, the agency’s acting director, after the report was released.

In addition to better defining responsibility for events, the senators recommended that the agency completely overhaul its communications operations at protective events and improve intelligence sharing. They also recommended that Congress evaluate whether more resources are needed.

Democrats and Republicans have disagreed on whether to give the Secret Service more money in the wake of its failures.

A spending bill on track to pass before the end of the month includes an additional 231 million dollars (£173 million) for the agency, but many Republicans have said an internal overhaul is needed first.

“This is a management problem plain and simple,” said Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, the top Republican on the Homeland panel’s investigations subcommittee.

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.