What will happen to Donald Trump’s criminal conviction?
A New York judge says he will make a decision as early as next week on the future of Donald Trump’s hush money case.
Donald Trump’s election victory created a conundrum for the judge overseeing his criminal case in New York. Can he go ahead and sentence the president-elect or would doing so potentially get in the way of Mr Trump’s constitutional responsibility to lead the nation?
Court documents made public on Tuesday revealed that Judge Juan M Merchan has effectively put the case on hold until at least November 19, while he and the lawyers on both sides weigh in on what should happen next.
Mr Trump’s sentencing had been tentatively scheduled for November 26.
Mr Trump’s lawyers are urging Mr Merchan to act “in the interests of justice” and rip up the verdict, the first criminal conviction of a former and now future US president.
Manhattan prosecutors told Mr Merchan they want to find a way forward that balances the “competing interests” of the jury’s verdict and Mr Trump’s responsibilities as president.
Here are some scenarios for what could happen next:
Wait until Mr Trump leaves office
If Mr Merchan wants to preserve the verdict without disrupting Mr Trump’s presidency, he could opt to delay sentencing until the president-elect leaves office in 2029.
Mr Trump would be 82 at the end of his second term and more than a decade removed from the events at the heart of the case.
Mr Trump’s conviction on 34 felon counts of falsifying business records involves his efforts to hide a 130,000 dollar payment during his 2016 presidential campaign to squelch porn actor Stormy Daniels’ claims that she had sex with him years earlier, which he denies.
If he opts to wait, Mr Merchan might not be on the bench by then as his current term ends before Mr Trump is slated to leave office.
Grant Mr Trump’s immunity claim
Another way Mr Merchan could get rid of the case is by granting Mr Trump’s previous request to overturn the verdict because of a US Supreme Court decision in July that gave presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution.
The judge had said he would issue a ruling on Tuesday, but that was before Mr Trump’s election victory upended the schedule.
The high court’s ruling gives former presidents immunity from prosecution for official acts and bars a prosecutor from using evidence of official acts in trying to prove their personal conduct violated the law.
Mr Trump’s lawyers argue prosecutors “tainted” the case with testimony about his first term and other evidence that shouldn’t have been allowed. Prosecutors have said the ruling provides “no basis for disturbing the jury’s verdict”.
The judge could order a new trial — potentially to take place after Mr Trump leaves office — or dismiss the indictment entirely.
Hold off until a federal court rules
Judge Merchan could choose to delay things until the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals rules on Mr Trump’s earlier bid to move the case from state court to federal court.
Mr Trump’s lawyers have been appealing the decision of a Manhattan federal judge to deny the transfer. Their argument is that Mr Trump’s case belongs in federal court because, as a former president, he has the right to assert immunity and seek dismissal.
Waiting for the appeals court to rule, though, might trigger further delays down the road. The court has given prosecutors until January 13 to respond to Mr Trump’s appeal. That is a week before he is to be sworn in to office.
Once Mr Trump is in the White House, his legal team could make fresh arguments around presidential immunity.
Case dismissed
Mr Merchan could end the case immediately by overturning Mr Trump’s conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. He could throw out the indictment.
That would mean no sentencing or punishment, sparing the president-elect from the possibility of prison time or other penalties.
Mr Trump’s lawyers insist tossing the case is the only way “to avoid unconstitutional impediments” to his ability to govern.
Prosecutors acknowledged the “unprecedented circumstances” of Mr Trump’s conviction colliding with his election but also said the jury’s verdict should stand.
Proceed to sentencing
Finally, Mr Merchan could also opt for none of the above and move to sentencing — or at least try, barring an appeal from Mr Trump’s lawyers.
George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin said whether the case reaches sentencing “could go either way”.
In any case, he said, “it probably won’t be a prison sentence”.
Mr Trump’s charges carry a range of punishments, from fines or probation to up to four years in prison.
“Any prison sentence would likely be blocked or suspended in some way,” but a lesser sentence “probably wouldn’t impede Trump to any meaningful degree,” Professor Somin said.
